My piece has been published at The Huffington Post!
Humanity has captured such beautiful moments in this world. A
pearly droplet snaking down a leaf, the sun rising behind a tree, shards of
sunlight reflecting off a pond. It takes half a second to uncover thousands of
unbelievable photographs, each one more inspiring and vibrant than the last. One
of the most intriguing photos I’ve seen is of a lightning
bolt simultaneously striking an airplane and following the path of a rainbow.
Another lovely one is the image of a leaf standing
on a tree branch.
Vemödalen (n). the frustration of photographing something
amazing when thousands of identical photos already exist.
Sometimes, it may indeed seem like there are millions of wonderful
photographs of the same phenomenon. I noticed this when looking at pictures of
the Aurora Borealis. The auroras are dazzling lights that dance in the sky – a seemingly
rare occurrence! So how can there be so many captured moments of them, each one
as surreal as the next? And at one point, it becomes difficult to choose the
photo I like the best – merely because there are so many magical samples to
choose from.
A few of my friends are young photographers. When I asked
them why they like photography, their responses were unanimous: because photos
are a means of capturing and saving experiences that would otherwise be lost. But
most of them were discouraged when
confronted by the fact that thousands of similar photographs have already been
taken. One of them told me: “It takes me days to take a photograph I’m proud
of. But it takes me minutes to realize that it’s just one in a million”.
Sometimes, I wonder why people don’t have an identical attitude
towards poetry. I’m very grateful that they don’t, but it still makes me wonder.
After all, millions of poems have been written – each employing similar words, similar
phrases, and reasonably similar ideas. And yet, I have never heard anyone say
that two poems are the same (or even comparable in any aspect!). After dwelling
upon it, I decided that it was because different writers have had different
experiences, and will hence look at the same scenario in divergent ways, and
will employ unalike tones. The poem will consequently flow in a different way. Moreover,
the interpretation of a poem strongly depends on the nature of the reader; most
of the time, two readers will construe the same piece in surprisingly unalike
ways!
So… why can’t these explanations be applied to photography?
I like to think that it’s because our eyes are superficial means of
interpretation. At least mine are. To my eyes, different shades of yellow are
identical, and there is little difference between salt on a black table and
stars in the sky. But could there be another reason? After all, I’m not the
only person who believes that there are thousands of photos that seem to
capture the same essence – and there’s a reason the word ‘vemödalen’ is slowly
assimilating into the English language.
It’s because we don’t invest the time into appreciating each
photograph for its individuality. An hour ago, I typed the word ‘waves’ into my
browser, and was presented with a cascade of different photographs, each
depicting curling blue waves in an ocean. Under normal circumstances, I would
have looked at the page at large, said ‘beautiful’ to myself, and then moved
on. But there’s a fundamental flaw in that kind of thinking; and it starts with
the words ‘at large’. On closer inspection, the photos were so radically different
that it seemed a sin to cluster them all under the same heading. The first one
depicted a turquoise, frothy sea, which reflected slivers of sunlight and burst
into droplets upon touching the water. The second one was a photo of calm
waters, mirror smooth, a beautiful blue, curling to the right. A few rows
lower, there was a photo taken from the inside of a wave, which was infused
with sunlight and was a living cave of its own. Each photo possessed its own
essence, its own story, and its own accompanying emotions. There was fury,
serenity, perfection, and magic. There was originality, and there was uniqueness.
At first glance, they may seem interchangeable. Some may say
that they are – for aren’t all those photos showing a volley of water
approaching a shore during the day? Yes, they are. But then again, doesn’t a
set of poems portray identical emotions and strangely similar experiences? It just
doesn’t seem like that, because we actually take the time to peruse its words
and inhale its lifeblood. Unlike photos, we don’t take a cursory glance at it
and hurry on to the next one.
Vemödalen: the frustration of photographing something
amazing when thousands of identical photos already exist. Or, in a parallel
vein, the fear that everything has already been done. It may seem like there’s nothing
we can capture that hasn’t been photographed before. But then again, each photo
is unique in its own way, and has a feature that separates it from the rest. We
just need to take the time to appreciate its individuality, just as we would
for a poem.
Nevertheless, it’s comforting to know that we are all
connected through our desire to capture our memories. Most of our photos aren’t
gapingly different, but are still special – much like ourselves. We are
similar, but we are not the same. When it seems like we have nothing new to add
– because we think that everything has already been done – remember that we have
our distinctive perspectives to contribute. And when it feels like we’re
getting lost in a wave of indistinguishable abilities, remember to take down
two photos capturing the same phenomenon – and appreciate the fact that at
their roots, they are fundamentally different.